Is There an Ideological Asymmetry in the Incumbency Effect? Evidence From U.S. Congressional Elections
نویسندگان
چکیده
The electoral advantage that incumbent legislators enjoy over challengers in the U.S. Congress has been investigated extensively political science. Very few studies, however, have considered role of individual differences when it comes to incumbency preferences among voters. Based on theory and research psychology, we hypothesized conservatives would exhibit stronger than liberals for incumbents from same party. Extensive analyses based more 150,000 voters seven election cycles United States 2006 2018 support this hypothesis. A significant effect conservatism was observed Senate House Representatives, not attributable Republican Party identification. This ideological asymmetry is consistent with system justification prior linking risk aversion status quo bias. Practical implications directions future are discussed.
منابع مشابه
By the Money, For the People: The Effect of Campaign Finance on US Congressional Elections
The Citizens United v. FEC United States Supreme Court decision in January of 2010 historically ruled that donating money to political causes is considered free speech under the constitution, and that corporations are people, thus giving them a constitutional right to donating money under the First Amendment. The ruling opened the floodgates for huge amounts of money into the US political syste...
متن کاملSpatiotemporal database of US congressional elections, 1896–2014
High-quality historical data about US Congressional elections has long provided common ground for electoral studies. However, advances in geographic information science have recently made it efficient to compile, distribute, and analyze large spatio-temporal data sets on the structure of US Congressional districts. A single spatio-temporal data set that relates US Congressional election results...
متن کاملThe Gubernatorial Coattails Effect: Federalism and Congressional Elections in Brazil
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your perso...
متن کاملIncumbency Effects and the Strength of Party Preferences: Evidence from Multiparty Elections in the United Kingdom
Previous researchers have speculated that incumbency effects are larger when voters have weaker partisan preferences, but evidence for this relationship is surprisingly weak. We offer a fresh look at the question by examining the U.K.’s multiparty system. In general, the electoral value of incumbency should depend on the proportion of voters who are nearly indifferent between the parties compet...
متن کاملOvercoming Ideological Bias in Elections
We study a model in which voters choose between two candidates on the basis of both ideology and competence. While the ideology of the candidates is commonly known, voters are imperfectly informed about competence. Voter preferences, however, are such that it is a dominant strategy to vote according to ideology alone. When voting is compulsory, the candidate of the majority ideology prevails an...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Social Psychological and Personality Science
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1948-5506', '1948-5514']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211046830