Is There an Ideological Asymmetry in the Incumbency Effect? Evidence From U.S. Congressional Elections

نویسندگان

چکیده

The electoral advantage that incumbent legislators enjoy over challengers in the U.S. Congress has been investigated extensively political science. Very few studies, however, have considered role of individual differences when it comes to incumbency preferences among voters. Based on theory and research psychology, we hypothesized conservatives would exhibit stronger than liberals for incumbents from same party. Extensive analyses based more 150,000 voters seven election cycles United States 2006 2018 support this hypothesis. A significant effect conservatism was observed Senate House Representatives, not attributable Republican Party identification. This ideological asymmetry is consistent with system justification prior linking risk aversion status quo bias. Practical implications directions future are discussed.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

By the Money, For the People: The Effect of Campaign Finance on US Congressional Elections

The Citizens United v. FEC United States Supreme Court decision in January of 2010 historically ruled that donating money to political causes is considered free speech under the constitution, and that corporations are people, thus giving them a constitutional right to donating money under the First Amendment. The ruling opened the floodgates for huge amounts of money into the US political syste...

متن کامل

Spatiotemporal database of US congressional elections, 1896–2014

High-quality historical data about US Congressional elections has long provided common ground for electoral studies. However, advances in geographic information science have recently made it efficient to compile, distribute, and analyze large spatio-temporal data sets on the structure of US Congressional districts. A single spatio-temporal data set that relates US Congressional election results...

متن کامل

The Gubernatorial Coattails Effect: Federalism and Congressional Elections in Brazil

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your perso...

متن کامل

Incumbency Effects and the Strength of Party Preferences: Evidence from Multiparty Elections in the United Kingdom

Previous researchers have speculated that incumbency effects are larger when voters have weaker partisan preferences, but evidence for this relationship is surprisingly weak. We offer a fresh look at the question by examining the U.K.’s multiparty system. In general, the electoral value of incumbency should depend on the proportion of voters who are nearly indifferent between the parties compet...

متن کامل

Overcoming Ideological Bias in Elections

We study a model in which voters choose between two candidates on the basis of both ideology and competence. While the ideology of the candidates is commonly known, voters are imperfectly informed about competence. Voter preferences, however, are such that it is a dominant strategy to vote according to ideology alone. When voting is compulsory, the candidate of the majority ideology prevails an...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Social Psychological and Personality Science

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1948-5506', '1948-5514']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211046830